Access your Pro+ Content below.
BPMN 2.0: Assessing a year of change
This article is part of the May 2012, Iss. 2 issue of Business Agility Insights
Business process model and notation 2.0 (BPMN 2.0) has been hailed for many features placing the standard above and beyond earlier versions. It seems that just about everyone from C-level executives to enterprise architects have an interest in how the standard can reshape modeling and the usefulness of leading industry tools. Brian Reale, founder and CEO of Colosa Inc., a developer of open source BPM products, isn’t among the standard’s detractors. But he definitely sees both negatives and positives. In terms of usability, “it’s fair to say that BPMN 2.0 isn’t too easy, but it also isn’t too difficult,” he said. Many vendors, including his own company, offer easier ways to draw and implement processes than those proposed in the BPMN 2.0 specifications, he said. On the other hand, Reale said, there would be some major drawbacks to a proprietary world. For starters, each vendor traditionally did process modeling differently—which, in fact, created the need for a standard that would keep users from being locked into a single ...
Access this PRO+ Content for Free!
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
Features in this issue
The updated process modeling standard continues to evolve—as does the debate about its advantages and disadvantages.
BPEL’s role as Web services orchestrator seems assured, but the broader spotlight has moved to BPMN 2.0.
Effective decision management can create serious competitive value—but only if those decisions lead to quantifiable business benefits
Columns in this issue
Learn what the most effective strategies are for implementing business process management (BPM) technologies.