Home > Ask the SOA Experts > Questions & Answers > Building a Web service using the .NET framework
Ask The SOA Expert: Questions & Answers
EMAIL THIS

Building a Web service using the .NET framework

Michèle Leroux Bustamante EXPERT RESPONSE FROM: Michèle Leroux Bustamante

Pose a Question
Other SOA Categories
Meet all SOA Experts
Become an Expert for this site


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


>
QUESTION POSED ON: 02 March 2005
I have some experience with J2EE and am interested in understanding how to create a multi-tier architecture for the .NET platform. For example, how do I communicate from the Web server tier to the application/database tier using RPC-like protocols, then return the results of that processing to the Web presentation layer (for example, JSPs). I have never used .NET and need to build a Web services application using this framework. What are my alternatives for this type of architecture using the .NET framework?

>

.NET Web services are hosted within the ASP.NET runtime environment. They are exposed through .asmx endpoints which have what is known as a code-behind file that has a WebService-derived class linked to it. This class is essentially "the service", and its methods (those marked with [WebMethod] attribute) are exposed as part of the automatically generated WSDL contract.

As a side note, typical of most platforms today, developers are building classes and methods to generate WSDL, however the better approach would be to create the WDSL contract first, and map that to business objects that handle processing. It requires discipline to follow this approach today.

The code that is encapsulated by the WebService object should never contain business logic, rather defer to other .NET assemblies that can be invoked in-process or out-of-process to perform the work required to execute the requested service method, and return a response (if not a one way method). That usually means that some form of faÇade layer is required to pull any business logic from the service class, and choreograph invocations to reusable business logic components (see Figure 1)

If you design your business logic in terms of logical, distributable services, then you should end up with a coupling of isolated sets of functionality that comprise an entry point assembly, one or more additional supporting assemblies, and some form of output or data store. For example, in Figure 1, you see that the application server tier has three entry point services: Service A, B and C. Imagine that Service C is a logging service that simply logs the Web service request "happened"; Service B is a service that handles the actual request processing, gathering data from the database, possibly committing some business information to the database; and Service A is a set of messaging and file IO services that handle generating some document output, like a PDF or email generated from the Web service request. Each of these business services can be isolated and distributed to whatever tiers you may desire, or be hosted entirely on the Web server tier, depending on your scalability requirements.

So, to your question, how do you distribute components and invoke them across tiers? Assuming your system is designed for reuse and distribution in this way, you can choose from Enterprise services, Remoting or Web services (these are the typical three choices).

  1. Enterprise Services is the best approach if you want to migrate to future technologies like Indigo, since the programming model will follow this route. That means registering Service A assembly (for example) as a serviced component with COM+, which implies it will be invoked over DCOM with binary serialization messaging format. The beauty of this is that you can leverage COM+ to handle object pooling, encryption, authorization services, runtime identity services and distributed transactions. A recommended resource for this is Juval Lowy's book, COM and .NET Component Services.
  2. There are a few reasons why Enterprise Services may not be an option for you. One reason could be that restrictions were placed on the system deployment that precludes enabling COM+ services and MSMQ. This is usually an issue on inexpensive host domains (your $10/month service provider dilemma) or because the company imposes these restrictions (sometimes for no reason, sometimes for good reason). Remoting is an option for these cases, because it is a completely hand-rolled solution for invoking objects across process boundaries. Of course, this means rolling your own authentication, encryption, runtime identity impersonation, object pooling. No built-in support for distributed transactions will be provided here. A recommended resource for Remoting is Ingo Rammer's book, Advanced .NET Remoting.
  3. Lastly, you can slap a Web service in front of the business services shown on the application tier. Note, I call them business "services" because they are services in their own right, a la "service-oriented" system design. Each major function within the system should be designed in a service-oriented way so that distribution of the components of that business service can be accomplished transparent to how the entire system cohesively functions. In addition, those services could be reused by other "systems".

So, the entry point to a business service can be through the remote invocation techniques described in 1 & 2, or through Web services if the business service either a) already exposed Web services due to its reuse outside of the firewall, or b) if the input to the service should be XML, and you want to reduce parsing overhead between the outer Web service and the business service. Behind the firewall, binary serialization over a speedy TCP/UDP protocol layer will perform better than XML over HTTP. The options for serialization and protocol selection will be seamless in future releases of the .NET framework(Indigo) however today it is a design decision that requires considering the deployment and invocation model during the design phase of the system.


To comment on this answer, please see my blog post here:
www.dasblonde.net


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   



RELATED CONTENT
Microsoft .NET Web services
Microsoft preps .NET 4.0 - framework improves on REST, MVC, JQuery support
How do I balance throughput requirements and interoperability?
APM software traces transactions across tiers, technologies
How you can learn M Grammar for Oslo modeling
Legacy modernization opens Windows for publisher
Former .NET Web developers ride Ruby and Rails application framework
Microsoft Oslo at PDC: Dial 'M' for modeling language
Yahoo proxy fight looms
New Microsoft site for architects
LAMP coders go hybrid route
Microsoft .NET Web services Research

WSDL (Web Services Description Language)
WSDL Tutorial
WSDLs get a report card
Amazon Mechanical Turk Web services app touts improved development GUI
SOA triple play: Policy meets Semantic Web
Eclipse Ganymede: Web Tools build SOA foundation
Java One: Mule architect looks to bring REST to SOA
WSDL technology
A middle way to SOA governance
WSDL 2.0, new messaging for Web services
WADL: The REST answer to WSDL

XML and XML schema
What's the future of XML?
SOA pattern of the week (#7): policy centralization
Try XML-based Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) for accounting reports
What's new at the W3C
Ganymede: Modeling tools target SOA, UML
Data services mashups emerge for SOA
Making sense of data services mashups
XML turns 10
SOA helps save 100-year-old business
Oracle maps heterogeneous data services strategy for SOA

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
Common Language Infrastructure  (SearchSOA.com)
Visual J#  (SearchSOA.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary



Search and Browse the Expert Answer Center
Search and browse more than 25,000 question and answer pairs from more than 250 TechTarget industry experts.
Browse our Expert Advice



SOA Governance White Papers - BPM, EDA, IT Governance
About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
SEARCH 
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2001 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts