Q

Why is a clean room JMS product a better performer than IBM MQ and MSMQ for publish/subscribe?

From your article on the differences between IBM MQ, MSMQ and JMS can you give me more detail on the following statement you made? Why is a clean room JMS product a better performer than IBM MQ and MSMQ for publish/subscribe? Internally, IBM MQ and MSMQ only implement the message queueing model, but not the publish/subscribe model. Hence, in IBM MQ, the JMS pub/sub model is realized atop of message queues, by creating one queue per...

subscriber, for example. This works but will not necessarily lead to good performance or scalability, as the middleware is not aware of pub/sub communication and thus does not provide any optimizations for that.

A clean-room JMS server typically provides a "native" implementation of the pub/sub domain, without simply layering it atop point-to-point queue. Some clean room JMS products even utilize IP multicast to broadcast JMS messages over local area networks. This further increases the scalability.

This was first published in April 2002

Dig deeper on Enterprise Application Integration (EAI)

Pro+

Features

Enjoy the benefits of Pro+ membership, learn more and join.

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

0 comments

Oldest 

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchSoftwareQuality

SearchCloudApplications

SearchAWS

TheServerSide

SearchWinDevelopment

Close