Q

Why is a JMS product easier to install and administer than MSMQ or IBM MQ?

From your article on the differences between IBM MQ, MSMQ and JMS can you give me more detail on the following statement you made? Why is a JMS product easier to install and administer than MSMQ or IBM MQ?
IBM MQ provides static configuration tables. Every queue needs to be manually configured in at least two tables (sender and receiver). Clean room JMS products typically require only little static configuration, and can create topics and queues dynamically at run-time.
This was last published in April 2002

Dig Deeper on Enterprise Application Integration (EAI)

PRO+

Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

Start the conversation

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchSoftwareQuality

SearchCloudApplications

SearchAWS

TheServerSide

SearchWinDevelopment

Close