Why is a JMS product easier to install and administer than MSMQ or IBM MQ?
From your
article on the differences between IBM MQ, MSMQ and JMS can you
give me more detail on the following statement you made? Why is a JMS product easier to install and administer than MSMQ or IBM MQ?
When you register, you'll begin receiving targeted emails from my team of award-winning writers. Our goal is to keep you informed on recent service-oriented architecture (SOA) and SOA-related topics such as integration, governance, Web services, Cloud and more.
Hannah Smalltree, Editorial Director
IBM MQ provides static configuration tables. Every queue needs
to be manually configured in at least two tables (sender and receiver).
Clean room JMS products typically require only little static configuration,
and can create topics and queues dynamically at run-time.
Dig Deeper
-
People who read this also read...
This was first published in April 2002