Is there progress in maintaining Web service transactions across different transaction servers?
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
The XA standard defines a mechanism to coordinate transactions across multiple transaction managers, but I'm skeptical about using 2PC technology across loosely coupled application systems. I'm of the opinion that we need to devise a new approach to manage loosely coupled transactions. There is such an effort underway at OASIS (www.oasis-open.org), called Business Transaction Processing (BTP). You might find this article on BTP enlightening.
But BTP is still a future. There are no implementations today.
The way you solve it today is to build transaction recovery into your applications. If part of your extended transaction fails, you must manually undo the other parts that have been committed. These "undo" methods are known as compensating transactions. It's not pretty, but it's the only viable approach today.
Related Q&A from Anne Thomas Manes
Anne Thomas Manes explains the differences between open source clients and open source implementations.continue reading
Anne Thomas Manes discusses the best way to go about creating an enterprise data dictionary and why the systems works well.continue reading
Anne Thomas Manes explains the difference between 'hard' real time and 'live' real time systems.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.